A Times B

View as PDF
Submit solution

Points: 30 (partial)
Time limit: 2.0s
Memory limit: 256M
Author:
FatalEagle

Problem type

Allowed languages
C , C++ , Pascal , Rust

For a while now, FatalEagle has been thinking about fast multiplication. He found the problem on SPOJ, MUL, and solved it without too much trouble. Then he found VFMUL on the same site, but the same code for MUL didn't pass as the SPOJ servers were really slow. Frustrated and desperate to show off demonstrate his fast multiplication code, FatalEagle has created a problem that really tests the accuracy and speed of your fast multiplication code.

Input Specification

The first line of input will have A.

The second line of input will have B.

Both A and B will be non-negative integers strictly less than 10^{1\,000\,001}.

Output Specification

Output the product A \times B.

Sample Input

123456123456123456123456123456123456
987987876876765765654654543543432432321321

Sample Output

121973153300851295215956247283945278187966162014464020099359068031370037005376

Comments


  • -3
    dawangk  commented on April 16, 2018, 9:07 p.m.

    No JAVA?


    • 2
      Ninjaclasher  commented on April 16, 2018, 10:13 p.m.

      read the comment right below you.

      V V V V V


  • -14
    SnowSR  commented on Dec. 6, 2015, 9:52 p.m.
    JAVA unavailable?

    Why not JAVA? Isn't BigInteger capable of processing numbers of any range?


    • 1
      Kirito  commented on June 12, 2016, 10:35 p.m.

      Funny thing; I was reading the Java BigInteger documentation, and the fastest multiplication method would take 6 seconds on a worst case.


    • 14
      arock  commented on Dec. 6, 2015, 9:59 p.m.

      That is precisely why Java is disallowed.


      • 2
        Beautiful_Times  commented on Dec. 1, 2017, 2:39 p.m.

        Couldn't we disable bigInteger and bigDecimal like a + b hard?


        • 2
          Kirito  commented on Dec. 1, 2017, 10:17 p.m.

          There exists a certain com.sun.media.sound.FFT, which would trivialize the problem. As we currently do not trivially support the banning of arbitrary packages, Java will continue to be banned.


        • 2
          InfernoApeZ  commented on Dec. 1, 2017, 3:34 p.m.

          yes i agree


          • 6
            jkguipqnjcy49979693  commented on Dec. 1, 2017, 9:04 p.m.

            I think the reason why it was not allowed later on was because Java is a lot slower than the currently allowed languages; now that custom language limits are allowed, someone needs to write a correct Java solution and then the Time Limits might be set accordingly.

            You could always bug Kirito via slack for these things btw, he undoubtedly enjoys it.

            As a side note, the current TL is probably too lenient as well because the judges are a lot faster now than they were ~3 yrs ago. (So maybe even Java can pass on the judge with these TLs)


  • -16
    FatalEagle  commented on Jan. 15, 2015, 10:15 a.m.
    Time Limit Changed

    Time limit lowered to 2s. Karatsuba shall not pass!


    • 2
      jcg9129  commented on Nov. 9, 2017, 7:20 a.m.

      My Karatsuba pass the tests, even faster than some FFTs implementations.