## CCC '16 S1 - Ragaman

View as PDF

Points: 3 (partial)
Time limit: 2.0s
Memory limit: 64M

Problem type
##### Canadian Computing Competition: 2016 Stage 1, Senior #1

An anagram of a string is formed by rearranging the letters in the string. For example, the anagrams of aab are aab, aba, and baa.

A wildcard anagram of a string is an anagram of the string where some of the letters might have been replaced with an asterisk (*). For example, two possible wildcard anagrams of aab are *ab and *b*.

Given two strings, determine whether the second string is a wildcard anagram of the first string.

#### Input Specification

The two lines of input will both consist of characters. Each character in the first line will be a lowercase letter. Each character in the second line will be either a lowercase letter or an asterisk.

For 8 of the 15 available marks, the second line will not contain any asterisk characters.

#### Output Specification

Output the character A if the string on the second line is a wildcard anagram of the string on the first line. Otherwise, output the character N.

#### Sample Input 1

abba
baaa

#### Output for Sample Input 1

N

#### Sample Input 2

cccrocks
socc*rk*

#### Output for Sample Input 2

A

• commented on Dec. 24, 2019, 1:31 p.m.

I don't think the editorial method works for the 3rd case of the 7th batch

• commented on Jan. 8, 2019, 4:04 p.m.

Could an input be '****'?

• commented on Sept. 11, 2020, 2:01 a.m.

Yes it can be

• commented on Dec. 29, 2018, 3:07 p.m.

Can i use "*" to replace two different letters? eg: aabcd ----> a**cd

• commented on Sept. 11, 2020, 11:45 p.m.

Yes, It can be

• commented on Aug. 16, 2019, 12:50 p.m.

I can't get more than 9 points and idk what it could be other than this

• commented on Aug. 24, 2017, 10:53 p.m.

This is a reminder that spam is not appreciated. Please read the comment rules and guidelines before posting, lest you be banned.

• commented on Dec. 30, 2018, 10:41 p.m.

how is that spam? He's just asking a question.

• commented on Jan. 8, 2019, 7:43 p.m.

You should look at the time stamps more carefully before commenting. That was in reference to comments cleaned up over a year ago.

• commented on Jan. 9, 2019, 2:55 p.m. edit 3

This comment is hidden due to too much negative feedback. Click here to view it.

• commented on Jan. 9, 2019, 5:11 p.m. edited

Regarding this kind of topic, it is better for this to be redirected to the DMOJ Slack. We highly advise you to join it using this link to prevent a chain of Re:'s in the comments.

• commented on Dec. 31, 2018, 7:08 p.m.

NOT ME!!!! please look at the comment date :-) (Btw: thanks dude)