CCC '19 S3 - Arithmetic Square - DMOJ: Modern Online Judge

CCC '19 S3 - Arithmetic Square

Points: 12 (partial)

Time limit: 0.6s

Memory limit: 512M

Problem type

Canadian Computing Competition: 2019 Stage 1, Senior #3

You are given a $3 \times 3$ ~3 \times 3~ grid which contains integers.

Some of the 9 elements in the grid will have a value already, and the remaining elements will be unspecified.

Your task is to determine values for the unspecified elements such that each row, when read from left-to-right is an arithmetic sequence, and that each column, when read from the top-down, is an arithmetic sequence.

Recall that an arithmetic sequence of length three is a sequence of integers of the form

$\displaystyle a, a+d, a+2d$ $$\displaystyle a, a+d, a+2d$$

for integer values of $a$ ~a~ and $d$ ~d~. Note that $d$ ~d~ may be any integer, including zero or a negative integer.

Input Specification

The input will be 3 lines long. Each line will have three space-separated values. Each value will either be an integer in the range from $-1\,000\,000 \text{ to } 1\,000\,000$ ~-1\,000\,000 \text{ to } 1\,000\,000~, inclusive, or the symbol X.

For 4 of the 15 marks available, there will be at most 3 X symbols in the input.

For an additional 3 of the 15 marks available, all integer values in the input will be between $-10 \text{ and } 10$ ~-10 \text{ and } 10~, inclusive.

For an additional 4 of the 15 marks available, there will be at least 7 X symbols in the input.

For an additional 2 of the 15 marks available, all integer values in the input will be even numbers.

Due to the official test data being weak, an additional subtask worth 1 mark has been added that consists of tests constructed to break solutions that are incorrect but AC on the official test data. Data are provided by d and xiaowuc1.

Output Specification

The output will be 3 lines long. Each line will have three space-separated integers. All integers that were given in the input must be in their same position (i.e., same row and same column as in the input). All rows and columns must form arithmetic sequences. All integers in the output must be between $-1\,000\,000\,000 \text{ and } 1\,000\,000\,000$ , inclusive.

If there is more than one solution, output any solution. There is guaranteed to be at least one solution.

Sample Input 1

8 9 10
16 X 20
24 X 30

Sample Output 1

8 9 10
16 18 20
24 27 30

Explanation of Output for Sample Input 1

Notice that the second element of the second row must be $16 + t$ ~16 + t~ and since $20 = 16 + 2t$ ~20 = 16 + 2t~, then $t = 2$ ~t = 2~, and thus, this unspecified element must be $18$ ~18~. A similar argument applies to the second element of the third row.

Sample Input 2

14 X X
X X 18
X 16 X

Possible Output for Sample Input 2

14 20 26
18 18 18
22 16 10

Explanation of Output for Sample Input 2

This is one of many possible solutions. For example, another solution is:

14 16 18
14 16 18
14 16 18

Comments

0

DynamicSquid commented on Feb. 14, 2021, 2:17 p.m.

I'm trying out a backtracking algorithm, but I keep getting TLE. Here's my attempt. How can I speed this up? Or do I have to use a different approach?

0

vishnus commented on Feb. 14, 2021, 8:24 p.m.

You can try a random number generator which generates a random number then tries to "fill" the grid, and continuously do each step until it generates a valid grid.

0

DynamicSquid commented on Feb. 15, 2021, 11:46 a.m.

Will that use a backtracking algorithm?

1

vishnus commented on March 11, 2021, 9:56 p.m.

Ehh don't wanna reveal too much, but kinda? Except it doesn't bank off previous random number generations.

1

zhenga1 commented on Feb. 11, 2021, 3:53 a.m.

Ok so I submitted a solution that is full marks, but I'm a bit curious, as previous submissions(of the exact same code), I did not get full marks and ended up with TLE. Is it just a thing with solutions that rely on random integer generation?

0

zhenga1 commented on Feb. 11, 2021, 2:59 a.m.

Why am I getting TLE on the last subtask, can someone help?

14

aaronhe07 commented on June 8, 2020, 8:12 p.m. ← edited →

It's unfortunate that a random solution is easier than the solution proposed in the editorial.

EDIT: and now apparently I have the top submission.

-7

echofox commented on March 4, 2020, 10:17 p.m.

epic problem

This comment is hidden due to too much negative feedback. Click here to view it.

3

KevinLiu1010 commented on Feb. 8, 2020, 9:53 p.m.

I'm not sure why my code fails the additional test cases, could someone please provide an example where it doesn't work?

18

helloword commented on Oct. 4, 2019, 1:17 p.m.

freaking difficult problem bro

2

zhenga1 commented on Feb. 11, 2021, 3:57 a.m.

Yes very difficult, and also you apparently can get varied scores if your solution is based on random numbers lmao. I submitted a solution(the same code) that got 13/16, 14/16, 15/16, and 16/16 each once(TLE was the error).

8

Plasmatic commented on Oct. 4, 2019, 3:11 p.m.

agreed

17

ChrisLi commented on June 14, 2019, 10:48 p.m.

this is freaking HARD

3

Ch4rIes commented on Nov. 8, 2020, 2:43 a.m.

I think the question itself is not extremely hard, but I dont think it is easy to solve in just 1 hour.

35

whomax commented on April 15, 2019, 3:13 p.m.

Hey, thanks Troy! ^_^

17

Plasmatic commented on April 7, 2019, 10:54 a.m. ← edit 3 →

:C

1

ochen1 commented on Feb. 15, 2021, 1:17 p.m.

Plasmatic tryna' XSS DMOJ 👀

12

666245 commented on April 6, 2019, 3:19 p.m.

Great problem. Who's the author though? :thinking:

10

p1geon commented on April 6, 2019, 8:27 p.m.

it's troy